[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publication statistics::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Publication Information
ju Publisher
Kharazmi University
ju Managing Director 
Nasergholi Sarli
ju Editor-in-Chief
Habib-Allah Abbasi
ju Manager
Zahra Saberi
ju In charge of the Site
Tahereh sadate Mirahmadi

EISSN 24766941
..
Indexing Databases

  AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
 AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
  AWT IMAGE 

   

..
Social Networks
   
..
:: year 31, Issue 94 (6-2023) ::
Persian Language and Literature 2023, 31(94): 309-336 Back to browse issues page
An Analysis of the Structure of Fi Halat al-Tufulliyah Treatise Based on the Actantial Model of Greimas
Majid Houshangi 1, Arefeh Hojjati2
1- Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran , m.houshangi@alzahra.ac.ir
2- MA in Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1024 Views)
In the period of new criticism and with the formation of new methods of narratology, several patterns emerged in the field of narrative recognition and criticism. In the meantime, Greimas’s model, inspired by Propp’s narratology, and relying on the philosophical principle of contrast, tried to analyze narratives based on the six actants of subject/object (goal), helper/opponent, sender/receiver in a new text analysis system. On the other hand, Suhrawardi, in a pre-textual style, and relying on his philosophical data, used the language of narration and allegory to explain his thoughts in such a way that some of his narrations can be analyzed from the perspective of Greimas. Based on a descriptive-analytical method, this research has analyzed the structure of contrasts in Fi Halat al-Tufulliyah treatise. The results indicated that the structure of this narrative is in a layered and nested form, arisen from the thought characteristic and dominant patterns in Suhrawardi’s mind and the presence of actants in this narrative can perfectly be seen and in some micro-narratives it is in the fluidity of roles. On the other hand, despite the presence of all three action elements in the macro-narrative and micro-narratives, the dominant action element can be considered as a covenant that plays a role in the attractiveness of the narrative compared to that of other Suhrawardi’s treatises. Finally, the object/goal alignment in the macro-narrative and the other four micro-narratives would lead to the prominence of this goal i.e., “reaching peace” in his thought system.
Keywords: Narratology, Greimas, Suhrawardi, Fi Hālat al-Tufulliyah.
Full-Text [PDF 4592 kb]   (431 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: نقد ادبی
References
1. آتش‌سودا، محمدعلي؛ و صادقي، سميرا (1391). ساختار داستان‌هاي شيخ اشراق براساس الگوي ولاديمير پراپ. ادبيات عرفاني و اسطوره‌شناختي. شمارة 27: 1-21.
2. احمدي، بابک (1372). ساختار و تأويل متن. تهران: مرکز.
3. اسکولز، رابرت (1383). درآمدي بر ساختارگرايي در ادبيات. ترجمة فرزانه طاهري. تهران: آگاه.
4. برتنز، يوهانس ويلهلم (1382). نظرية ادبي. ترجمة فرزان سجودي. تهران: آهنگ ديگر.
5. پاينده، حسين (1388). نقد ادبي و دموکراسي. تهران: نيلوفر.
6. پورنامداريان، تقي (1389). عقل سرخ: شرح و تأويل داستان‌هاي رمزي سهروردي. تهران: سخن.
7. تايسن، ليس (1394). نظريه¬هاي نقد ادبي معاصر. مازيار حسين‌زاده و فاطمه حسيني. ويراستة حسين پاينده. تهران: نگاه امروز/ حکايت قلم نوين.
8. تقي‌نژاد رودبنه، فاطمه (1394). نقد ساختاري روايت در رسالة لغت موران سهروردي. مجموعه مقاله¬هاي دهمين همايش بين¬المللي انجمن ترويج زبان و ادبيات فارسي. دانشگاه محقق اردبيلي. 794-806.
9. تولان، مايکل. جي (1383). درآمدي نقادانه‌ـ‌‌زبان‌شناختي بر روايت. ترجمة ابوالفضل حرّي. تهران: بنياد سينمايي فارابي.
10. حسن¬لي، کاووس (1387). بازخواني فرماليستي غزلي از بيدل. نقد ادبي. سال اول. شمارة 2: 29-38.
11. جعفري، فاطمه (1388). نقد روايي آثار داستاني شيخ اشراق. پايان‌نامة کارشناسي‌ارشد. دانشگاه تربيت مدرس.
12. جوادي، مهديه (1389). تحليل ساختاري داستان‌هاي فارسي سهروردي برمبناي شيوة پراپ. پايان‌نامة کارشناسي‌ارشد. دانشگاه پيام‌نور تهران.
13. خالد غفاري، سيدمحمد (1389). نوجويي در فلسفة سهروردي و گوناگوني تعريف علم در آثار او. پژوهشنامة زبان و ادب فارسي (گوهر گويا). شمارة 1: 69-92.
14. رضايي، ليلا؛ و قلخانباز، ميثم (1399). بررسي ساختار روايت در رسالة في حقيقـة العشق سهروردي. ادبيات عرفاني دانشگاه الزهراء، شمارة 22: 33-58.
15. رضوي، مهدي‌امين (1377). سهروردي و مکتب اشراق. ترجمة مجدالدين کيواني. تهران: مرکز.
16. ريمون‌کنان، شلوميت (1387). روايت داستاني: بوطيقاي معاصر. ترجمة ابوالفضل حرّي. تهران: نيلوفر.
17. سجادي، سيدجعفر (1376). شرح رسائل فارسي سهروردي. تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامي.
18. سجودي، فرزان (1384). نشانه‌شناسي و ادبيات. تهران: فرهنگ کاوش.
19. سلدن، رامان (1377). نظرية ادبي و نقد عملي. ترجمة جلال سخنور و نيما زماني. تهران: فرزانگان پيشرو.
20. سلدن، رامان؛ و ويدوسون، پيتر (1384). راهنماي نظرية ادبي معاصر. ترجمة عباس مخبر. تهران: طرح‌نو.
21. سهروردي، شهاب‌الدين (1380). مجموعة مصنفات شيخ اشراق. ترجمة سيدحسين نصر. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انساني.
22. شفيعي‌کدکني، محمدرضا (1391). رستاخيز کلمات. تهران: سخن.
23. شميسا، سيروس (1383). نقد ادبي. تهران: فردوس.
24. صادقي حسن‌آبادي، مجيد؛ و زارع، فاطمه (1393). سرّ و مصاديق آن در عرفان با تأکيد بر انديشة ابن‌عربي. اديان و عرفان. سال چهل‌وهفتم. شمارة 2: 263-281.
25. صمدي، کلثوم (1390). سير تطور و تحول رساله‌الطيرها در ادب فارسي. پايان‌نامة کارشناسي‌ارشد. دانشگاه تربيت مدرس.
26. غفاري، محمدخالد (1389). نوجويي در فلسفة سهروردي و گوناگوني تعريف علم در آثار او. پژوهشنامة زبان و ادب فارسي (گوهر گويا). شمارة 1: 69-92.
27. فتوحي، محمود (1383). تمثيل؛ ماهيت، اقسام، کارکرد. مجلة دانشکدة ادبيات و علوم انساني دانشگاه خوارزمي. شمارة 47-49: 141-177.
28. گورين، ويلفرد. ال، و ديگران (1377). راهنماي رويکردهاي نقد ادبي. ترجمة زهرا ميهن‌خواه. تهران: اطلاعات.
29. مکاريک، ايرنا ريما (1385). دانش¬نامة نظرية ادبي معاصر. ترجمة مهران مهاجر و محمد نبوي. تهران: آگاه.
30. منصور سيف‌آباد، بهناز (1388). ريخت‌شناسي داستان‌هاي فارسي شهاب‌الدين سهروردي. پايان‌نامة کارشناسي‌ارشد. دانشگاه الزهراء.
31. نبي¬لو، عليرضا (1392). بررسي تقابل¬هاي دوگانه در غزل¬هاي حافظ. زبان و ادبيات فارسي دانشگاه خوارزمي. سال بيست‌ويکم. شمارة 7: 69-91.
32. هارلند، ريچارد (1385). از افلاطون تا بارت. ترجمة گروه مترجمان. تهران: چشمه.
33. هوشنگي، مجيد؛ و جعفري، فاطمه (1394). تحليل و بررسي رسالة عقل سرخ شيخ اشراق براساس نظرية روايت تودوروف. پژوهش¬هاي ادبي. شمارة 47: 149-168.
34. هوشنگي، مجيد؛ و حجتي، عارفه (1401). تحليل تطبيقي الگوي کنشگر در رسائل فارسي سهروردي از منظر گرماس. ادبيات عرفاني دانشگاه الزهراء. دورة چهاردهم. شمارة 30: 9-43.
35. Prince, Gerald (2003). A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska press
36. Hebert, Louis. (2005). Tools for Text and Image Analysis, Julie tabler. available at http: //www.signosemio.com.
37. Ātashsowdā, Mohammad Ali; & Sādeghi, Samirā (2012). The structure of Sheikh Eshraq's stories based on the model of Viladimir Propp, Mitho-Mystic Literature, No 27, Pp 1-21. [In Persian]
38. Ahmadi, Bābak (1993). The Text structure and textural interpretation, Tehrān: Markaz. [In Persian]
39. Bertens, Hans (2005). Literary Theory: The Basics, Translated by Mohammad Abolqāsemi, Tehrān: Māhi. [In Persian]
40. Fotouhi, Mahmoud (2005). Allegory Nature, Types and Function. Persian Language and Literature of Khārazmi University, Vol 13 (47): Pp 139-176. [In Persian]
41. Guerin, Wilfred Earle Labor, et al (1998). A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, Translated by Zahrā Mihankhāh, Tehrān: Ettelāat. [In Persian]
42. Harland, Richard (2006). Literary Theory from Plato to Barthes, Group of translators, Tehrān: Cheshmeh. [In Persian]
43. Hassanli, Kāvous (2008). A Formalistic Re-reading of a Ghazal of Bidel Dehlavi, Literary Criticism, 1 (2): 29-38. [In Persian]
44. Jafari, Fātemeh (2009). Narrative criticism of Sheikh Ashraq's fictional works, Master's thesis. Tehrān: Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian]
45. Javādi, Mahdieh (2010). Structural analysis of Suhrawardi's Persian stories based on the Propp method, Master's thesis. Tehrān: Payām-e Noor University. [In Persian]
46. Khāled Ghaffāri, Seyyed Mohammad (2010). Innovation in Sohrevardi's Philosophy and Variety of Science Definitions in his Works, Research on Mystical Literature, Vo 4, N.1: Pp 69-92. [In Persian]
47. Makaryk. Irene Rima (2011). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory, translated by Mehrān Mohājer & Mohammad Nabavi, Tehrān: Āgāh. [In Persian]
48. Mansour Seifābād, Behnāz (2008). Morphology of Shahābuddin Suhrawardi's Persian stories, Master's thesis: Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian]
49. Nabiloo, Ali Reza (2013). Evaluation of the Binary Oppositions in the Ghazals of Hafiz, Persian Language and Literature of Khārazmi University, 21(74): 69-91 [In Persian]
50. Pāyandeh, Hossein (2009). Literary Criticism and Democracy, Tehrān: Niloufar. [In Persian]
51. Pournāmdāriān, Taqi (2010). Aghl-e Sorkh: Interpretation and Analysis of Symbolic Fictions of Sohrevardi, Tehrān: Sokhan. [In Persian]
52. Razavi, Medi Amin (1998). Suhrawardi and the School of Illumination, translated by Majd-Aldin Keivāni, Tehrān: Markaz. [In Persian]
53. Rezāei, Leilā; & Ghalkhānbāz, Meysam (2020). A Study on Narrative Structure of Fi Haqiqat al-'Ishq (On the Reality of Love) Treatise by Suhrawardi, Mystical Literature of Alzahra University, Vol 12, Issue 22, Pp 33-58. [In Persian]
54. Samadi, Kolsoum (2011). The course of development and evolution of Risalat al-Tayrah in Persian Literature. Master's thesis: Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian]
55. Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith (2008). Narrative Fiction, translated by Abolfazl Horri, Tehrān: Niloufar. [In Persian]
56. Rowhāni, Masoud; & Enāyati Qādikolaee, Mohammad (2017). Binary Oppositions in the Lyrics of Attār Neishābouri. Persian Language and Literature of Kharazmi University, 24 (81): 201-221. [In Persian] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jpll.24.81.201]
57. Sajjādi, Jafar (1977). A Descriptive Writing on Sohrevardi's Persian Treatise, Tehrān: Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture. [In Persian]
58. Sādeqi hassan Ābādi, Majid; & Zāree, Fātemeh (2014). Secret and Its Extensions in Mysticism With emphasis on Ibn 'Arabi, Religions and Mysticism, Vol. 47, No. 2: 263- 281. [In Persian]
59. Scholes, Robert (2004). Structuralism in Literature, translated by Farzāneh Tāheri, Tehrān: Āgāh. [In Persian]
60. Selden, Raman (1998). Practicing Theory and Reading Literature: An Introduction (Literary Theory), translated by Abbās Mokhber, Tehrān: Farzānegān-e Pishrow. [In Persian]
61. Selden, Raman & Peter Widdowson (2005). A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory, translated by Abbās Mokhber, Tehrān: Tarh-e Now. [In Persian]
62. Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Rezā (2012) Resurrection of words, Tehrān: Sokhan. [In Persian]
63. Shamisā, Syrus (1999). Literary Criticism, Tehrān: Ferdows. [In Persian]
64. Sohrevardi, Shahāb Al-din (2001). Collection of works of Sheikh-e Ishrāq, translated by Hossein Nasr, Tehrān: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
65. Sojoudi, Farzān (2005). Semiotics and Literature, Tehrān: Kāvosh. [In Persian]
66. Taqinejād Roudboneh, Fātemeh (2015). Structural criticism of narrative in "Loqat-e Moran" of Suhrawardi, Collection of articles of the 10th International Conference on the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature, Mohaghegh Ardabili University. Pp 794-806. [In Persian]
67. Tyson, Lois (2008). Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide, translated by Māziyār Hosseinzādeh & Fātemeh Hosseini, Edited by Hossein Pāyandeh, Tehrān: Hikāyat-e Ghalam-e Novin. [In Persian]
68. Toolan, Michael (2004). A Critical Linguistic Introduction to the Narrative, translated by Abolfazl Horri, Tehrān: Fārābi. [In Persian]
69. Houshangi, Majid; & Jafari, Fātemeh (2015). Analysis of the treatise "Aqle Sorkh" by Sheikh Eshrāq, based on Todorov's narrative theory, Literary Research, Vol 47, Pp 149-168. [In Persian]
70. Houshangi, Majid; & Hojjati, Ārefeh (2022). Comparative Analysis of Actantial Model in Suhrawardi's Persian Epistles from the Perspective of Greimas, Vol 14, Issue 30: 9-43 [In Persian]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

houshangi M, hojjati A. An Analysis of the Structure of Fi Halat al-Tufulliyah Treatise Based on the Actantial Model of Greimas. Persian Language and Literature 2023; 31 (94) :309-336
URL: http://jpll.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4238-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 31, Issue 94 (6-2023) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه  زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه خوارزمی Half-Yearly Persian Language and Literature
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645