|
Reviewing, Analyzing and Criticizing of the Metonymy
|
Ahmad Rezaei jamkarani    |
| Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, University of Qom, Qom, Iran , a-rezaei@qom.ac.ir |
|
|
Abstract: (1235 Views) |
| The main problem is to attend to one aspect and neglect the other aspects. Despite the efforts of Muslim scholars in these works, the research on metonymy have not received much attention. Therefore, while dealing with the transition of metonymy studies in the works of Muslim theologians, the present research has investigated this issue from different perspectives in rhetorical books. The results show that although logocentrism, the intermingling of different domains, abstract theological topics, unnecessary divisions, disregard for the functional aspect of language, overlapping types of metonymy, and repetition of the content are the main research problems of this kind, the theory of scientists such as Jorjani and Khatib Qazvini about the aspects of information, pragmatics and the context in the metonymy field should not be ignored. Also, the divisions proposed in these works, such as its categorization by metonymy (metalepsis) and the compound metonymy, along with their subfields, are significant. |
|
| Keywords: Comparative studies, authorized, sages, rhetoricians |
|
|
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
فنون بلاغی
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
